How would you react if I put some Pentahydroxyhexanal in your coffee mug?
It may look strange but it is right, when you name a chemical by its real name, it always looks more harmful. James Dunworth is completely right in his review on Prolylene Glycol when he says that chemicals are all around us but not necessarily harmful. Dihydrogen monoxide and Pentahydroxyhexanal are just water and sugar and each of us consumes them everyday.
Is Propylene Glycol dangerous to inhale?
As everyone knows, or not, Propylene glycol or PG is is one of the major constituents of our e-liquids and whether is it dangerous upon inhalation is nagging all of us. Beyond the chemical properties of the molecule, a pertinent analysis has been made by the author.
Among other things, the article teaches us that PG is GRAS, generally recognized as safe, by the US FDA and the standards impose to be of pharmaceutical grade for commercial use.
Studies on animals
We also learn that most studies on PG involving animals concluded in the absence of toxicological effect or acute disease associated to the ingestion of the inhalation of the product, even during long-term (several weeks) exposure.
Studies on humans
Another interesting angle that is offered by the author is that the fog machines employed in the theatres to give more depth to the shots also use PG. Hence, a major source of human-related studies are those that consider theatre staff exposure to artificial fog. Here again, no acute diseases were found when considered that exposure was to PG but also to other chemicals contained in the liquid.
Absolute risk versus relative risk
“PG isn’t an angel, but it probably isn’t going to kill you either”
This is the conclusion that is drawn by the author, based on his careful analysis in addition to advices in order to reduce the potential risks associated to the molecule.