“MOSCOW — Russia’s economy minister was detained overnight on charges of soliciting a $2 million bribe about a huge oil deal, the country’s Investigative Committee announced on Tuesday.

The minister, Alexei Ulyukayev, 60, was the highest-level official arrested in Russia since a failed coup in 1991. He was detained in the middle of the night, a tactic reminiscent of the Soviet era that has not been seen in recent years.”

So, what has this to do with e-cigarettes?

Well, the people at the top, in any country, are not to be trusted. In this instance rules governing vaping products are, sorry, apologies were, in the hands of a man, ‘possibly,’ wide open to bribery. We see this connection in a tiny paragraph (third from last) in an article not dealing with vaping.

Nothing new in this! In the EU, the initial TPD was influenced by a Commissioner, who, like his ‘buddy’ above, was open to financial inducement. I am not sure what the ‘upper limit’ for ‘acceptable bribery’ in the EU is, but this chappie obviously exceeded it.

The ‘gentleman’ in question was, John Dalli. The BBC reported…

“EU anti-fraud agency, Olaf, had earlier delivered a report asserting that Mr Dalli had held unauthorised secret meetings with tobacco industry representatives.”

But, wait for it…

“This is a year after the same person had been accused of trying to move one hundred million dollars to the Bahamas.

Dalli argued that the money was not for him, and that he was transferring the money to help some friends who in turn wanted to help a charity in Africa.”

No corruption at the top? Step forward Santa ‘Claws.’

James Dunworth who looked at this affair states…

“Over the years, I’ve seen a fair amount of evidence which suggests that anti-e cig movement could at least in part be financially motivated:

It is naïve in the extreme to think that corruption is not rife in the war against vaping.

Corrupt government officials: University departments depending on pharmaceutical company grants for their research; researchers who are incompetent in the field of e cigarette research; ingrained prejudice and zealotry; downright ignorance of the facts, and worst of all, an organisation who everyone relies on for accuracy and expertise, the World Health Organisation, forging ahead in the vanguard of inaccuracy, deceit, secrecy and dare I say it…

I have no need to say it, have I?

Everything expressed in this article is the personal view of the writer.


Book your ad here
Previous articleSmoking continues to plummet in the US
Next articleFrance: SOVAPE publishes its consultation report
All articles express my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the Editor's view.
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

I couldn’t agree with you more. I’ve also seen, over the last year or so, three remarks by councillors in the US bemoaning lower MSA payments because of reduced cigarette sales thanks to ecigarettes. One said they needed MSA payments to prop up their budgets in order to buy books for school children and another, in a newspaper article, called cigarettes the “Golden Goose” saying they must be careful not to lose it.