The flavored chemicals present in e-liquids may be responsible for a severe pulmonary disease
This article has been updated on June 7, 2016

Diacetyl and other flavored molecules have been targeted by researchers who discovered relative innocuousness upon ingestion but a potentially strong harmfulness when inhaled. The first cases were described in food factories where Diacetyl was used as a flavor for popcorns and cases were further described in other sectors.

“Recognition of the hazards associated with inhaling flavoring chemicals started with ‘Popcorn Lung’ over a decade ago. However, diacetyl and other related flavoring chemicals are used in many other flavors beyond butter-flavored popcorn, including fruit flavors, alcohol flavors, and, we learned in our study, candy flavored e-cigarettes.” -J. Allen, first author.
In their study [1], the researchers Joseph Allen and colleagues from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, MA, tested 51 e-liquids for the presence of Diacetyl, Acetylpropionyl and Acetoin. They found at least one of the three substances in 92% of the samples and Diacetyl, specifically, in 76%.


With more than 7,000 varieties of flavors marketed in the USA and the increasing popularity of the e-cigarette using those liquids, the Assistant Professor of exposure assessment science and first author of this publication stresses the emergency of the situation, in the absence of current regulation.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a proposed rule to include vaping products under its authority to regulate certain tobacco and nicotine-containing products but the official publication of this bill is not expected before January 1, 2016 for an implementation expected in early 2016. The absence of legal frame may be at the origin of class actions against manufacturers: The e-liquid manufacturer Five Pawns has already been subject to suing by class action for deliberate use of the Diacetyl and Acetylpropionyl in the receipts of its e-liquids.

In an interview for the Harvard Gazette, after the publication of their paper, the J. Allen adds that the flavored liquids are very popular among the youngest vapers who would be the most affected population. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a proposed rule to include e-cigarettes under its authority to regulate certain tobacco and nicotine-containing products and its publication is expected after January 1, 2016. According to figures, the e-cigarette is mainly associated to smoking cessation in a population of smokers and their use by never-smokers is scarce. The young population who “tries it” generally do not stick to their use on the long-term and studies confirm that it should not be considered as a gateway to tobacco, either in France or in Europe and probably also in the USA.

“Since most of the health concerns about e-cigarettes have focused on nicotine, there is still much we do not know about e-cigarettes. In addition to containing varying levels of the addictive substance nicotine, they also contain other cancer-causing chemicals, such as formaldehyde, and as our study shows, flavoring chemicals that can cause lung damage,” -D. Christiani, co-author. 
His colleague David Christiani, Elkan Blout Professor of Environmental Genetics recommends to make use of the precaution principle with regard to these molecules.


Dr K. Farsalinos, whose study was cited by his Harvard colleagues, judges that the article is “creating false impressions and exaggerates the potential risk from Diacetyl and Acetylpropionyl exposure through e-cigarettes”. Farsalinos’ comments address two points:

  1. Allen et al. failed to mention the presence of these compounds in tobacco smoke it creates the false impression that it is a new hazard ;
  2. The levels shown by Allen et al. are in the lower range of the values he found himself in his samples. Another aspect of the discussion is the controversial use of NIOSH safety limits that address the tolerable concentration of volatile organic compounds in working environments.

The controversy comes from the fact that the population considered for the use of NIOSH safety limits is supposed to be the most vulnerable people in a general population of never-smokers. This of course does not apply to vapers who are former smokers.

“We should not forget that the risk from discouraging smokers to use e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool is higher than the risk of being exposed to diacetyl and acetyl propionyl at the average levels found in this study. ,” -K. Farsalinos.
Farsalinos recalls that smokers are more exposed than vapers to those harmful molecules that are present in a greater amount in tobacco smoke than in e-liquide vapor. For vapers, those flavored chemicals represent an “avoidable risk” since their presence can be substituted by other molecules with a less (even no) harmful potential.




Update on 6/07/2016:

The “popcorn lung” debate

In reaction to J. Allen’s article, Jennifer Pierce and her co-authors commented [2] and vigorously criticized the way their colleagues presented the problem raised by the presence of Diacetyl, Acetylpropionyl and Acetoin in e-liquids.

They pointed out that such airborne diketone levels above the NIOSH and ACGIH OELs are not necessarily indicative of respiratory risk. No “popcorn lung” has been shown to be associated to unflavored coffee beans, even if these grains are naturally rich in such compounds.

A second point addressed by the scientists is that naturally occurring Diacetyl and Acetylpropionyl were measured at higher levels in cigarette smoke. Hence, switching from smoking to vaping decreases exposure to these compounds, and corresponds to a lowering of the respiratory risk, which is not straightforward when reading Allen et al.’s manuscript.

To finish, the authors recall that “the causal relationship between diacetyl exposure and development of bronchiolitis obliterans has not been firmly established” (OSHA 2016), which leaves open the debate of an increased risk of diketone-related “popcorn lung” or any other serious respiratory disease in flavorings-exposed workers and, hence, vapers.

Allen et al. [3] counteract Pierce et al.‘s comments not only on their arguments, bargaining on statistics, but also on their publications and especially on the suspicious way two of them underwent peer-review within only three days.

The counterattack ends on the risk for the children who are trying e-cigarettes without smoking for whom the exposition is not decreasing. Allen et al. quote the 160,000 US kids, non-smokers, who are particularly appealed by the sweetest flavors like cupcake and cotton candy. Therefore, they recommend “to evaluate this potential hazard further, restrict access by youth, and provide consumers with information and warnings similar to those given to workers“.

Considering that such vaping products are intended to adults above 18 of age (as imposed by the law) and their access theoretically forbidden to minors, such recommendation made by Allen et al. seems irrelevant.

Some standards are already in place

Current MHRA guidance documents that have been elaborated by the UK bans Diacetyl and Acetylpropionyl (or pentane 2,3 dione) from e-liquids in its draft version, so does the AFNOR standard XP D90-300-2 for diacetyl. The institute declared to be ready to deliver certifications for e-liquids that complies with the new regulation.


[1] Allen JG, Flanigan SS, LeBlanc M, Vallarino J, MacNaughton P, Stewart JH, Christiani DC. 2015. Flavoring Chemicals in E-Cigarettes: Diacetyl, 2,3-Pentanedione, and Acetoin in a Sample of 51 Products, Including Fruit-, Candy-, and Cocktail-Flavored E-Cigarettes. Environ Health Perspect;

[2] Pierce JS., Abelmann A., Finley BL. 2016. Comment on “Flavoring Chemicals in E-Cigarettes: Diacetyl, 2,3-Pentanedione, and Acetoin in a Sample of 51 Products, Including Fruit-, Candy-, and CocktailFlavored E-Cigarettes”. Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1611350

[3] Allen JG, Flanigan SS, LeBlanc M, Vallarino J, MacNaughton P, Stewart JH, Christiani DC. 2016. Response to “Comment on “Flavoring Chemicals in E-Cigarettes: Diacetyl, 2,3-Pentanedione, and Acetoin in a Sample of 51 Products, Including Fruit-, Candy-, and CocktailFlavored E-Cigarettes” Environ Health Perspect; DOI:10.1289/EHP348

Previous articleItaly: Ecig use resumes from a 2-year vaping crisis
Next articleIs vaping replacing one addiction for another?
PhD in science and journalist for the Vaping Post. Specialised in scientific topics.
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
En analys som underlåter jämföra med tobak |
7 years ago

[…] Men. Det är nonsens. […]